Feminist "theorists" are big on "objectification", by which they mean treating women as "sex objects" rather than as people. However, looking into this theory deeper, it would appear that it is not the woman HERSELF who it being regarded as the object - it is her body parts and accessories.
Like neat busters, trim posterior, red lips, shiny lips, eye shadow, eye liner, narrow waist, painted finger nails and toe nails, the curve of the foot attendant on wearing stilleto-heeled shoes.
Isn't "objectivization" therefore a form of fetishism?
Are women's body parts and accessories sex objects in themselves?
bananassss
Reply:ditto
tanning
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment